When the arguments of secularists in favour of Film Village and the First Lady's mode of dress during her visit to the US, crumble down like a pack of cards in the face of defying force of ''moral police'' and ''eshaykhs'', one of the vanquished soul pops up in the midst of broken pieces of his argument and dishes a query: '' Why were the moral police mute when one highly placed cleric was mentioned among the beneficiaries of #DasukiGate''
To this I respond that it's not right to pass judgement based on mistaken identity. You are falling into the same mistake Fayose and Pro-Fayose has fallen by accusing innocent Aisha Buhari of involvement in Halliburton scandal just because there is one Aisha in the list of the accused. You see, the so-called highly placed cleric assumed to be mentioned among the beneficiaries of #DasukiGate is Shaykh Abdullahi Bala Lau. However, the document as reported by all the newspapers didn't mention ''ABDULLAHI BALA LAU'' but one ''BALA ABDULLAHI'' with red dots in the lists. The following links and screenshots back my assertion:
To this I respond that it's not right to pass judgement based on mistaken identity. You are falling into the same mistake Fayose and Pro-Fayose has fallen by accusing innocent Aisha Buhari of involvement in Halliburton scandal just because there is one Aisha in the list of the accused. You see, the so-called highly placed cleric assumed to be mentioned among the beneficiaries of #DasukiGate is Shaykh Abdullahi Bala Lau. However, the document as reported by all the newspapers didn't mention ''ABDULLAHI BALA LAU'' but one ''BALA ABDULLAHI'' with red dots in the lists. The following links and screenshots back my assertion:
No comments:
Post a Comment